Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2015)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 505
Decided
September 23, 2015
Judge
John D. Love, M.J. — Tyler
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER issued in accordance with the mandate issued by the Federal Circuit
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

EIDOS DISPLAY, LLC, and

§

EIDOS III, LLC

§ §

Plaintiffs,

§ § No. 6:11cv201 JRG-JDL v.

§ § JURY DEMANDED

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

§ §

Defendants.

§

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER

Pursuant to and in accordance with the mandate issued by the Federal Circuit (Doc. No. 483), this Court hereby supplements its claim construction opinion and finds that the limitation “a contact hole for source wiring and gate wiring connection terminals” means “separate contact holes for source wiring connection terminals and gate wiring connection terminals.”

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of September, 2015.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00201-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00201-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case