Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Azure Networks LLC et al v. CSR plc et al, No. 6:11-cv-00139 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00139, Dkt. No. 290
Decided
May 17, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 267 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. All objections are overruled and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness is DENIED
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

AZURE NETWORKS, LLC et al., § § NO. 6:11cv139 MHS-JDL vs. § § PATENT CASE

CSR PLC, et al. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 267) (“Report and Recommendation”), which contains his finding that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,756,129 (“the ‘129 Patent”) are not invalid for indefiniteness, has been presented for consideration. Defendants Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, CSR plc, Cambridge Silicon Radio International LLC, Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Ralink Technology Corporation [Taiwan], Ralink Technology Corporation [USA], Texas Instruments Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) have filed objections to the Report and Recommendations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) (Doc. No. 271). Plaintiff Azure Networks, LLC has filed a Response (Doc. No. 280). . Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court. All objections are overruled and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 248) is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 17th day of May, 2013.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Azure Networks LLC et al v. CSR plc et al, No. 6:11-cv-00139 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00139-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00139-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.