Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Skyguard, LLC et al, No. 6:11-cv-00015 (E.D. Tex. July 27, 2012)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00015, Dkt. No. 188
Decided
July 27, 2012
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 137 Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC §

§ Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 6:11-CV-15-

§ LED-JDL

v. § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

SKYGUARD, LLC, ET AL., §

§ Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“Report”), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 137). Defendant Novatel Wireless, Inc. (“Novatel”) has filed a notice joining a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity on Grounds of Indefiniteness filed in EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al., 6:10-cv-379 (the “‘379 action”). See (Doc. No. 122). The Court previously adopted Magistrate Judge’s identical report in the ‘379 action. See ‘379 action at (Doc. No. 737) (overruling objections and adopting the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. No. 612)). Neither party has filed objections to the Report. The Court is again of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Skyguard, LLC et al, No. 6:11-cv-00015 (E.D. Tex. July 27, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00015-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00015-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.