Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00580 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00580, Dkt. No. 413
Decided
March 27, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 355 Report and Recommendations, and denying HTC's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement 313
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

SMARTPHONE TECHNOLOGIES §

LLC, §

§ NO. 6:10cv580 LED-JDL vs. § § PATENT CASE

HTC CORPORATION, et al. §

ORDER ADOPTING ORDER OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R&R”), which denies HTC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement (Doc. No. 313), has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 355). Defendants moved for summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,693,949; 6,760,728; 7,076,275; and 7,506,064. The Magistrate Judge recommended denial of HTC’s motion, stating that a genuine issue of material fact remained. R&R AT 1. HTC filed objections (Doc. No. 406) to the Report and Recommendation, arguing that “no issue of fact exists that HTC does not infringe.” OBJECTIONS AT 1. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, all objections are overruled.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of March, 2013.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00580 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_10-cv-00580-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_10-cv-00580-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.