Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Global Ground automation, Inc. v. Groundrez, LLC, No. 6:08-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00374, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
August 9, 2010
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 58 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

GLOBAL GROUND AUTOMATION §

INC., § §

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-374-LED-JDL v. § § GROUNDREZ, LLC, § §

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 58), dismisses this case for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Orders of this Court under Federal Rule 41(b). No objections have been filed. Having carefully considered the history of this litigation, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Global Ground automation, Inc. v. Groundrez, LLC, No. 6:08-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2010).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00374-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00374-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.