Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00144 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2009)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00144, Dkt. No. 512
Decided
August 24, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 379 Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

REALTIME DATA, LLC D/B/A IXO, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION No. 6:08cv144

v. §

§

PACKETEER, INC., et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. (Doc. No. 379). Defendants Blue Coat Systems, Inc., Packeteer, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., ABM-Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Services–South Central, Inc., and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (collectively, “Blue Coat Defendants”) have filed Objections to Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness Entered June 23, 2009 (“Objections”) (Doc. No. 395), arguing that the Magistrate Judge made errors in the Report regarding the terms “compression rate” and “substantially greater.”1 Id. Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendants’ Objections, (Doc. No. 452), and a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 460). The Blue Coat Defendants also filed a Reply (Doc. No. 458).

1Defendants F5 Networks, Inc., Averitt Express, Inc., DHL Express (USA), Inc., and Citrix Systems, Inc.

all joined in the Blue Coat Defendants’ Objections. (Doc. Nos. 400, 401, 404, 412).

2The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of August, 2009.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00144 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00144-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00144-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.