Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Teirstein v. AGA Medical Corporation, No. 6:08-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2009)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 51
Decided
March 16, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 46 Report and Recommendations, and denying 7 Motion to Strike, Dismiss, or for a More Definite Statement, filed by Paul Teirstein
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

DR. PAUL TEIRSTEIN, § §

Plaintiff, § §

v. § CIVIL ACTION No. 6:08cv14 § AGA MEDICAL CORPORATION, § §

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 46), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike, Dismiss, or For a More Definite Statement and Brief in Support Thereof (Doc. No. 7), has been presented for consideration. No objections have been filed. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike, Dismiss, or For a More Definite Statement and Brief in Support Thereof (Doc. No. 7) be DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Teirstein v. AGA Medical Corporation, No. 6:08-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00014-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_08-cv-00014-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.