Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC v. Daimler Chrysler Co LLC et al, No. 6:07-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00346, Dkt. No. 187
Decided
July 3, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J. — Tyler
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 186 Motion to Stay deadlines for 30 days, at which time the parties will advise the court of the status of settlement discussions
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

ST SALES TECH HOLDINGS, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff. )

)

v. )

) C.A. NO. 6:07-CV-346-LED-JDL

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CO., LLC, et al., ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants. )

) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al. ) )

Counterclaim Plaintiff. )

)

v. )

)

ST SALES TECH HOLDINGS, LLC, )

)

Counterclaim Defendant. )

) MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. )

)

Counterclaim Plaintiff. )

)

v. )

)

ST SALES TECH HOLDINGS, LLC, )

)

Counterclaim Defendant. )

) ) MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. )

)

Third Party Plaintiff. )

)

v. )

)

ERICH SPANGENBERG and ORION IP, LLC, ) )

Third Party Defendants. )

2ORDER GRANTING

JOINT MOTION TO STAY DEADLINES

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant ST Sales Tech Holdings, LLC, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Ford Motor Company, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. and Land Rover North America, Inc., Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff, and Third Party Plaintiff Mazda Motor of America, Inc., and Third-Party Defendants Erich Spangenberg and Orion IP, LLC (collectively “the parties”). The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. . It is therefore ORDERED that all outstanding deadlines are stayed for 30-days, at which time the parties will advise the Court of the status of settlement discussions.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of July, 2008.

JOHN D. LOVE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC v. Daimler Chrysler Co LLC et al, No. 6:07-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_07-cv-00346-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_07-cv-00346-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.