Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Interactive Music Technology LLC v. Roland Corp U S et al, No. 6:07-cv-00282 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2008)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00282, Dkt. No. 58
Decided
January 29, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 57 Report and Recommendations, and granting 19 Defendant Roland's Motion to Transfer 25 Defendant Yamaha Corporation's Motion to Transfer and 38 Defendant Open Labs' Motion to Transfer; denying …
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

INTERACTIVE MUSIC §

TECHNOLOGY, LLC §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:07-CV-282

§

ROLAND CORP. U.S., et al §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 57). The parties did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Roland’s motion to transfer (Doc. No. 19); Defendant Yamaha Corporation of America’s Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Doc. No. 25); and Defendant Open Labs, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Doc. No. 38) are GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), and Defendant Roland’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of January, 2008.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Interactive Music Technology LLC v. Roland Corp U S et al, No. 6:07-cv-00282 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_07-cv-00282-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_07-cv-00282-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.