Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Push Data LLC v. Sherwin-Williams Company, No. 5:21-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2022)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:21-cv-00072, Dkt. No. 25
Decided
June 24, 2022
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J. — Texarkana
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Push Data's claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against Push Data are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

PUSH DATA LLC, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00069-RWS v. § § LEAD CASE

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION §

§

PUSH DATA LLC, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00070-RWS v. § § JERSEY MIKES FRANCHISE SYSTEMS §

INC. §

PUSH DATA LLC, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00072-RWS v. § § SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY §

PUSH DATA LLC, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00075-RWS v. § § RETAIL SERVICES & SYSTEMS, INC., §

D.B.A. TOTAL WINE & MORE §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Push Data LLC’s (“Push Data”) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Docket No. 36) as to Defendants Dollar General Corporation, Jersey Mike’s Franchise Systems Inc., Sherwin-Williams Company and Retail Services & Systems, Inc., d.b.a. Total Wine & More (collectively, “Defendants”). Accordingly, it is

2.

ORDERED that Push Data’s claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against Push Data are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further

ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses shall be borne by the party incurring the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 24th day of June, 2022.

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Push Data LLC v. Sherwin-Williams Company, No. 5:21-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_21-cv-00072-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_21-cv-00072-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.