Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Packet Tread LLC v. RAD Data Communications, Inc., No. 5:17-cv-00004 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:17-cv-00004, Dkt. No. 8
Decided
September 25, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the cases
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

PACKET TREAD LLC, §

Plaintiff, § §

v. § Case No. 5:17-cv-4-JRG-CMC § RAD DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. §

Defendant. §

PACKET TREAD LLC, §

Plaintiff, § §

v. § Case No. 5:17-cv-16-JRG-CMC § VANGUARD NETWORKS SOLUTIONS§

LLC §

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-entitled and numbered civil actions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Reports of the Magistrate Judge which contain her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such actions has been presented for consideration. On September 7, 2017, the Magistrate Judge recommended the above cases be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

No objections were filed to the Reports. Rather, on September 21, 2017, Plaintiff Packet Tread LLC filed responses to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, stating it does not object to the recommendations the Court dismiss the cases without prejudice.

2The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Reports of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s above-entitled and numbered causes of action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the cases. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Packet Tread LLC v. RAD Data Communications, Inc., No. 5:17-cv-00004 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_17-cv-00004-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_17-cv-00004-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.