Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Intellectual Captial Holdings Limited v. NEC Corporation of america et al, No. 5:08-cv-00065 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2009)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:08-cv-00065, Dkt. No. 67
Decided
June 19, 2009
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Change Venue
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ICHL, LLC d/b/a INTELLECTUAL § CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED §

Plaintiff § §

V. § No. 5:08CV65 § NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, §

ET AL. §

Defendants §

ICHL, LLC d/b/a INTELLECTUAL § CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED §

Plaintiff § §

V. § No. 5:08CV175 § BFG TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. §

Defendants §

ICHL, LLC d/b/a INTELLECTUAL § CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED §

Plaintiff § §

V. § No. 5:08CV177 § LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL. §

Defendants §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were2 filed. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Defendant BFG Technologies, Inc., EVGA Corporation, and PNY Technologies, Inc.’s Joint Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 31); and ICHL I and III Defendants’ Joint Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. Nos. 57, 50) are DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intellectual Captial Holdings Limited v. NEC Corporation of america et al, No. 5:08-cv-00065 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_08-cv-00065-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_08-cv-00065-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.