Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Horizon Fitness, Inc. et al, No. 5:08-cv-00026 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:08-cv-00026, Dkt. No. 225
Decided
August 21, 2009
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER finding as moot 165 Motion to Dismiss
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., § a Delaware Corporation §

Plaintiff § §

V. § No. 5:08CV26 § HORIZON FITNESS, INC. et al.., §

Defendants §

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges, Plaintiff ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Count III, Count IV, Count VIII, and Count X from True Fitness Technology, In c.’s Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaim (Docket Entry # 165), dated May 7, 2009, was referred to the undersigned for the purpose of preparing a report and recommendation. On May 11, 2009, Defendant True Fitness Technology, Inc. filed an Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Docket Entry # 168). On May 18, Plaintiff filed an amended Motion to Dismiss Count III, Count IV, Count VIII, and Count X from True Fitness Technology, In c.’s Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaim (Docket Entry # 171). Based on the filing of Plaintiffs’ amended motion, the Court is of the opinion the original motion to dismiss should be DENIED AS MOOT. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Count III, Count IV, Count VIII, and Count X from True Fitness Technology, In c.’s Amended Answer to First2 Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaim (Docket Entry # 165) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Horizon Fitness, Inc. et al, No. 5:08-cv-00026 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_08-cv-00026-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_08-cv-00026-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.