Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Motorola Inc v. Vtech Communications, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:07-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 208
Decided
August 27, 2009
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 163 Sealed Motion to amend invalidity contentions; granting 205 Motion for Leave to amend Texas Patent Rule 3 Disclosures
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

MOTOROLA, INC., §

§ Plaintiff and § Counterclaim-Defendant, § v. § No. 5:07-cv-00171-DF-CMC § Jury VTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., §

VTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS §

LTD. §

§ Defendants and § Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. § ____________________________________§

ORDER GRANTING MOTOROLA AND VTECH LEAVE TO AMEND

THEIR PATENT RULE 3 DISCLOSURES

Having considered Motorola’s And VTech’s Joint Motion for Leave to Amend Their Eastern District of Texas Patent Rule 3 Disclosures, the Court hereby ORDERS that (1) Motorola is granted leave to serve its amended Patent Rule 3-1(f) disclosures on VTech; (2) VTech is granted leave to amend its invalidity contentions as set forth in D.I. 163; and (3) VTech is granted leave to amend its invalidity contentions to add materials relating to Sony MagicLink and Apple Hypercard.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Motorola Inc v. Vtech Communications, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00171-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00171-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.