MEMORANDUM ORDER; adopting 189 Report and Recommendations, Motions terminated: denied without prejudice to refiling 171 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Ingenico Inc,
V. § No. 5:02CV95§INGENICO S.A.,d/b/aGROUPE §INGENICO, ET AL. §
MEMORANDUM ORDER
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Ingenico’s Corrected Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of NonInfringement (Dkt. No. 171) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Datatreasury Corp v. Ingenico S.A., et al, No. 5:02-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2005).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.