Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

OnPoint Systems, LLC v. Protect animals With Satellites, LLC, No. 4:20-cv-00657 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:20-cv-00657, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
July 28, 2021
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J. — Sherman
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Status Conference is DENIED as moot
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

ONPOINT SYSTEMS, LLC §

§ Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-657 v. § Judge Mazzant § PROTECT ANIMALS WITH §

SATELLITES, LLC §

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Status Conference (Dkt. #46). Having considered the Motion, the Court finds it should be DENIED as moot. This is a patent infringement suit. On September 1, 2020, Plaintiff OnPoint Systems, LLC (“OPS”) sued Defendant Protect Animals with Satellites, LLC (“PAWS”) for infringing U.S. Patent No. 9,848,295 (the “’295 patent”) (Dkt. #1). On June 11, 2021, OPS moved for leave to amend its complaint to add two additional patents to the case (Dkt. #42). Separately, OPS moved the Court for a status conference to discuss how the pending motion impacts the scheduling order (Dkt. #46). PAWS argues a status conference is premature while the motion for leave to amend remains pending (Dkt. #53). On July 26, 2021, the Court granted OPS’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. #58). OPS’s Motion for Status Conference to discuss the pending motion is now moot, as the underlying motion is no longer pending. If the parties would like to adjust specific deadlines, they may submit a joint motion to amend the scheduling order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

OnPoint Systems, LLC v. Protect animals With Satellites, LLC, No. 4:20-cv-00657 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2021).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_20-cv-00657-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_20-cv-00657-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.