Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Dynamic applet Technologies, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al, No. 4:17-cv-00860 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00860, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
May 13, 2019
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 130 Motion to Dismiss filed by Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC, 131 Report and Recommendations. This entire action, and all of the claims asserted t…
Length
2 pages

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DYNAMIC APPLET TECHNOLOGIES,

§

LLC,

§ §

Plaintiff,

§ § Civil Action No.: 4:17-cv-00860 (LEAD) v.

§ § 4:17-cv-00862 (CONSOLIDATED) URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.,

§ §

Defendant.

§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,

the matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On April 23, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (the “Report”) (Dkt. #131) was entered, containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #130) be granted. See id. Plaintiff Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Urban Outfitters, Inc. (“Defendant”) are the only remaining parties in this matter.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections

thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to

Dismiss (Dkt. #130) is GRANTED, and this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs.

2All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE

this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Dynamic applet Technologies, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al, No. 4:17-cv-00860 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_17-cv-00860-4
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_17-cv-00860-4

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.