Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

HowLink Global LLC v. Centris Information Systems, LLC et al, No. 4:11-cv-00071 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2015)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00071, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
January 8, 2015
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 189 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 183 Motion for Attorney Fees,, filed by Network Communications International Corp, DENYING 178 Motion for Bill o…
Length
1 page

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

HOWLINK GLOBAL LLC §

§

V. § CASE NO. 4:11cv71

§ (Judge Mazzant)

CENTRIS INFORMATION §

SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Network Communications International Corp.’s Motion for Costs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 68 of Plaintiff Howlink Global LLC (Dkt. #178) and Opposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. #183) be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Network Communications International Corp.’s Motion for Costs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 68 of Plaintiff Howlink Global LLC (Dkt. #178) and Defendant Network Communications International Corp.’s Opposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. #183) are DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

HowLink Global LLC v. Centris Information Systems, LLC et al, No. 4:11-cv-00071 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00071-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00071-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.