Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation, No. 4:08-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2016)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:08-cv-00451, Dkt. No. 570
Decided
April 26, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - With the exception of the parties negotiating a reasonable royalty, all matters in this case have now been resolved. If the parties are not able to successfully negotiate a reasonable royalty on their own, the court strongly suggest…
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC §

SOLUTIONS, INC., § §

Plaintiff, § §

v. § Case No. 4:08-CV-451 § INTERSIL CORPORATION, § §

Defendant. §

ORDER

With the exception of the parties negotiating a reasonable royalty, all matters in this case have now been resolved. If the parties are not able to successfully negotiate a reasonable royalty on their own, the court strongly suggests that the parties move the court for additional time to negotiate a reasonable royalty with the assistance of the mediator. The parties are encouraged to resolve this one remaining issue in this case in order to bring it to a complete resolution. Alternatively, the parties are encouraged to settle the entire case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation, No. 4:08-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_08-cv-00451-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_08-cv-00451-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case