Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Perrone Robotics, Inc. v. Toyota Motor et al, No. 2:25-cv-01150 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-01150, Dkt. No. 84
Decided
September 30, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 78 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion to Dismiss filed by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc. [24 in member case 2:25cv1151] (Kia Defendants). (Motion(s)23, 78 terminat…
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PERRONE ROBOTICS, INC., PERRONE §

ROBOTICS INNOVATIONS, LLC, §

§ Case No. 2:25-cv-01150-JRG-RSP Plaintiffs,

§

v.

§ (Lead Case)

TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, §

INC., TOYOTA MOTOR §

CORPORATION, §

§

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING

Defendants each previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 23 (Toyota Defendants); Dkt. No. 24 in Member Case No. 2:25-cv-001151 (Kia Defendants).) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 78), recommending denial of both Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendants have now filed Objections (Dkt. Nos. 82 (Toyota), 83 (Kia)), with no response filed.

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the Report . and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendant’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendant’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that both Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 23; Dkt. No. 24 in Member Case No. 2:25-cv-001151) be DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of September, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Perrone Robotics, Inc. v. Toyota Motor et al, No. 2:25-cv-01150 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-01150-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-01150-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.