Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Alpha Modus, Corp. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-01060 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2026)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-01060, Dkt. No. 135
Decided
September 29, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 125 Report and Recommendations re 52 Motion to Dismiss filed by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Motion(s)52, 125 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ALPHA MODUS, CORP., §

§

Plaintiff,

§ Case No. 2:25-CV-01060-JRG-RSP v.

§

7-ELEVEN, INC., § (Lead Case)

§

Defendant. .

ORDER

Defendant 7-Eleven Inc. previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 52.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 125), recommending denial of the motion. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, it is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alpha Modus, Corp. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-01060 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-01060-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-01060-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved October 1, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case