ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 100 Report and Recommendations, 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Whirlpool Corporation. (Motion(s)100, 4 terminated)
. Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 4.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 100), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Because no objections have been filed1 and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 4) is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of September, 2026.
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Footnotes
↩1 The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed a “Notice of Nonobjection,” where it states that while it “respectfully disagrees with particular statements and conclusions in the Court’s Report and Recommendation…[Plaintiff] does not intend to seek de novo review by the District Judge.” See Dkt. No. 104.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Whirlpool Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-01042 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2026).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.