IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
§
YILLIO, INC.,
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. CASE NO. 2:25-CV-00533-JRG-RSP
§
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER
Uber Technologies, Inc., (“Uber”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Improper Venue and Failure to State a Claim. (Dkt. No. 40.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 84), recommending that the Motion be granted and that the above-captio ned case be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Yillio, Inc., (“Yillio”) has since filed Objections (Dkt. No. 91), with Uber filing a Response (Dkt. No. 92).
After conducting a de novo review of th e briefing on Uber’s Mo tion, the Report . and Recommendation, and the briefing on Yillio’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes the Objections fail to show the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequen tly, th e Court OVERRULES Yillio’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS the Motion. (Dkt. No. 40). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case, and ORDERS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE, the above-captioned case.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of September, 2026.