Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Yillio, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00533 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2026)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00533, Dkt. No. 94
Decided
September 25, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 84 Report and Recommendations. The Court OVERRULES Yillio's Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS the Motion. (Dkt. No. 40). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

§

YILLIO, INC.,

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. CASE NO. 2:25-CV-00533-JRG-RSP

§

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §

§

Defendants.

§

ORDER

Uber Technologies, Inc., (“Uber”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Improper Venue and Failure to State a Claim. (Dkt. No. 40.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 84), recommending that the Motion be granted and that the above-captio ned case be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Yillio, Inc., (“Yillio”) has since filed Objections (Dkt. No. 91), with Uber filing a Response (Dkt. No. 92).

After conducting a de novo review of th e briefing on Uber’s Mo tion, the Report . and Recommendation, and the briefing on Yillio’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes the Objections fail to show the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequen tly, th e Court OVERRULES Yillio’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS the Motion. (Dkt. No. 40). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case, and ORDERS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE, the above-captioned case.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of September, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Yillio, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00533 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-00533-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-00533-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.