Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Longi Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd. v. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-00048 (E.D. Tex. June 25, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00048, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
June 25, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 17 SEALED MOTION All Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. (Motion(s)17, 35 terminated)
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

LONGI GREEN ENERGY §

TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., §

§ §

Plaintiff,

§

v. § Civil Action No. 2:25-cv-00048-JRG-RSP

§

JINKO SOLAR CO., LTD., JINKOSOLAR §

HOLDING CO., LTD., JINKOSOLAR §

(VIETNAM) INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., and § JINKO SOLAR TECHNOLOGY SDN. §

BHD., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Defendants Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.; Jinko Solar Technology Sdn. Bhd.; and Jinko Solar (Vietnam) Industries Co. Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. No. 17.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation recommending denial of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 35.) Defendants filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 37.) Plaintiff LONGi Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd. filed a Response. (Dkt. No. 40.)

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendants’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants’ Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED.

2.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of June, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Longi Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd. v. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-00048 (E.D. Tex. June 25, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-00048-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-00048-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.