Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al, No. 2:24-cv-01077 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-01077, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
June 23, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PHENIX LONGHORN LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 2:24-cv-01077-RWS-RSP

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG

MEXICANA S.A. DE C.V., and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants. .

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File a Proposed Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn, LLC and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Dkt. No. 64. After considering the same, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that the Parties’ deadline to file a proposed Protective Order is extended to June 25, 2025.

SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012.

SIGNED this 23rd day of June, 2025.

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al, No. 2:24-cv-01077 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-01077-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-01077-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.