IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC, §
§
Plaintiff,
§
v.
§ CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00688-JRG-RSP THE HOME DEPOT, INC., HOME (LEAD CASE)
§
DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
§ §
Defendants.
§
RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC, §
§
Plaintiff,
§
v.
§ CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00688-JRG-RSP WALMART INC. and WAL-MART (MEMBER CASE)
§
STORES TEXAS, LLC,
§ §
Defendants.
§ §
ORDER
Defendants Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, and Walmart Inc. (“Defendants”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 33.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 123), recommending denial of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Defendants have now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 129). No response was filed.
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendant’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendant’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 33) is DENIED.
2.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of March, 2026.