IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ELECTRALED, INC., §
§
Plaintiff,
§
v. §
§
ASTERA LED TECHNOLOGY GMBH,
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00512-JRG-RSP §
ASTERA MANUFACTURING LIMITED,
§
AND ASTERA DISTRIBUTION
§
LIMITED,
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER
Defendants Astera Manufacturing Limited and Astera Distribution Limited previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b) (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 25). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56), recommending denial of Astera’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6). Astera has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 62).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6), the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Astera’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Astera’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion to2 .
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(2) and for Failure to State a Claim under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 25) is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of September, 2025.