IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
§
VALTRUS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,
§
Plaintiff, §
§ CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00361-JRG-RSP v.
§ (Lead Case) NTT DATA SERVICES, LLC,
§ §
Defendant.
§ §
VERTIV CORPORATION,
§
Plaintiff, §
§ CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00907-JRG-RSP v.
§ (Member Case) VALTRUS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, §
§
Defendant.
ORDER
Valtrus Innovations Ltd. (“Valtrus”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 121.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 253), recommending denial of Valtrus’s Motion. Valtrus has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 254.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Valtrus’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Valtrus’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion (Dkt. No. 121) is DENIED.
2.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of March, 2026.