Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

DigitalDoors, Inc. v Cathay Bank, No. 2:24-cv-00312 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00312, Dkt. No. 75
Decided
March 28, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 71 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion to Dismiss filed by Frost Bank (Motion(s)71, 23 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DIGITALDOORS, INC., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00312-JRG-RSP

§ (Lead Case) CATHAY BANK, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

Frost Bank previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Dkt. No. 23.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation recommending denial of Frost’s Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 71.) Frost has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 74.) .

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Frost’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Frost’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 23) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DigitalDoors, Inc. v Cathay Bank, No. 2:24-cv-00312 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-00312-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-00312-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case