Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Comerica Bank, No. 2:23-cv-00541 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00541, Dkt. No. 84
Decided
September 27, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)77 terminated)
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DIGITALDOORS, INC., §

§

Plaintiff, § v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00541-JRG-RSP § (Lead Case) COMERICA BANK, §

§

Defendant.

§

DIGITALDOORS, INC., §

§

Plaintiff, § v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00548-JRG-RSP § (Member Case) FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST §

COMPANY, §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

First Citizens Bank & Trust Company previously filed a Motion to Dismiss prior to . consolidation of the above-captioned cases (Member Case No. 2:23-cv-00548, Dkt. No. 10). After consolidation, Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 77), recommending denial of First Citizens’ Motion to Dismiss. No objections have been filed. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Member Case No. 2:23-cv-00548, Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of September, 2024.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Comerica Bank, No. 2:23-cv-00541 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00541-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00541-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.