Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00539 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00539, Dkt. No. 373
Decided
April 24, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 362 Over Objections 371
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SK NEXILIS CO., LTD., §

§

Plaintiff,

§ §

v.

§

SOLUS ADVANCED MATERIALS CO., §

LTD., VOLTA ENERGY SOLUTIONS §

S.A.R.L., VOLTA ENERGY SOLUTIONS § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00539-JRG-RSP EUROPE KFT., VOLTA ENERGY §

SOLUTIONS HUNGARY KFT., and § VOLTA ENERGY SOLUTIONS §

CANADA INC., §

§

Defendants.

§

ORDER

Plaintiff SK nexilis Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) previously filed a Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Craig Arnold (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 147.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 362), denying Plaintiff’s Motion. Plaintiff has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 371.) .

After reviewing the briefing on the Motion, Judge Payne’s Memorandum Order, and the briefing on Plaintiff’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Memorandum Order and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Memorandum Order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections (Dkt. No. 371) and ADOPTS Judge Payne’s Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 362).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of April, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00539 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00539-6
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00539-6

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.