Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Longitude Licensing Limited v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00515 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Induced Infringement Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00515, Dkt. No. 282
Decided
August 6, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 234 Report and Recommendations re 189 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Pre-Notice Indirect Infringement and Pre-Notice Damages
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED, §

§

Plaintiff, § § v. §

§ CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00515-JRG-RSP

BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., §

LTD., § §

Defendant. §

ORDER

Defendant BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. (“BOE”) previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Pre-Notice Indirect Infringement and Pre-Notice Damages. (Dkt. No. 189.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 234), recommending denial of BOE’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. BOE has now filed Objections . (Dkt. No. 278).

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Partial Summary . Judgment, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on BOE’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES BOE’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 189) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of August, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Longitude Licensing Limited v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00515 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00515-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00515-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · revised at source August 5, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case