IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
PICTIVA DISPLAYS INTERNATIONAL §
LTD. and KEY PATENT INNOVATIONS § LIMITED, §
§
Plaintiffs, §
§ v. §
CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00495-JRG-RSP
§ SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. § and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § AMERICA, INC., §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) previously filed several case-dispositive motions in the above-captioned case: a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Certain Accused Products (“Products Motion”) (Dkt. No. 236); a Motion for Summary Judgment of Failure to Mark Under 35 U.S.C. § 287 and No Pre-Notice Damages (“Marking Motion”) (Dkt. No. 242); and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement of Plaintiffs’ Asserted Patents (“Willfulness Motion”) (Dkt. No. 246.)
Magistrate Judge Payne entered Report and Recommendations (“R&R”) on the Products Motion (Dkt. No. 502) recommending grant as to the non-OLED products and denial otherwise, the Marking Motion (Dkt. No. 505) recommending denial, and the Willfulness Motion (Dkt. No. 506) recommending grant as to no pre-suit willful infringement of the ‘547 and ‘425 Patents and denial otherwise. To R&R on the Products Motion, Samsung filed Objections (Dkt. No. 509), and so did Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 510.) To the R&R on the Marking Motion, Samsung filed Objections2 (Dkt. No. 523.) To the R&R on the Willfulness Motion, Plaintiffs filed Objections (Dkt. No. 529), and so did Samsung (Dkt. No. 536.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Products Motion, Marking Motion, and Willfulness Motion, the relevant R&Rs, and the briefing on Samsung and Plaintiffs’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the R&Rs and concludes that the . Objections fail to show that the R&Rs were erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Samsung and Plaintiffs’ Objections and ADOPTS the R&Rs and orders that: the Products Motion (Dkt. No. 236) is GRANTED as to the non-OLED products and is DENIED otherwise; the Marking Motion (Dkt. No. 242) is DENIED; and the Willfulness Motion (Dkt. No. 246) is GRANTED as to no pre-suit willful infringement of the ‘547 and ‘425 Patents and is DENIED otherwise.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of October, 2025.