Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Anonymous Media Research Holdings LLC v Samsung Electronics america, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00439, Dkt. No. 250
Decided
September 18, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 225 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANONYMOUS MEDIA RESEARCH §

HOLDINGS, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff,

§

v. §

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00439-JRG-RSP §

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

§

AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG

§

ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

§

Defendants.

§

ORDER

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (collectively, . “Defendants”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,719,849 (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 125.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 225), recommending denial of Defendants’ Motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 18th day of September, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Anonymous Media Research Holdings LLC v Samsung Electronics america, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00439-5
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00439-5

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.