Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00124 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00124, Dkt. No. 114
Decided
January 22, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 113 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)113 terminated)
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES PTE. §

LTD., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00124-JRG-RSP

§

VIZIO, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

VIZIO, Inc. previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Rule 12(b)(3). . Dkt. No. 16. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 113), recommending DENIAL of the motion and that, in the interests of justice, the case instead be TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. Since no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned case be TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California WITHOUT DELAY.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of January, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00124 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00124-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00124-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.