IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00123-JRG-RSP
§
AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY §
LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, and § AT&T SERVICES INC., §
§
Defendants, §
§
ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF § AMERICA CORP., §
§
Intervenors. §
§
ORDER
AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC, and AT&T Services Inc. previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Daingean’s Use of Licensed Android Handsets. (Dkt. No. 204.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 443), recommending denial of AT&T’ s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Daingean’s Use of Licensed Android Handsets. AT&T has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 446), with Daingean filing a Response (Dkt. No. 451).
After conducting a de novo review of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Daingean’s Use of Licensed Android Handsets, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on AT&T’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections
2Cas. e 2:23-cv-00123-JRG-RSP Document 546 Filed 09/03/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES AT&T’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Daingean’s Use of Licensed Android Handsets (Dkt. No. 204) is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of September, 2025.