HTC Corporation previously filed a Motion to Dismiss ("the Motion"). (Member Case 2:23-cv-077, Dkt. No. 22.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 98) in which he recommended denying the Motion. Due to no objections being filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion (Member Case 2:23-cv-077, Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2024.
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00081 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2024).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.