U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00437, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
June 29, 2023
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
6/29/2023. (ch, )ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 29 Report and Recommendations Court OVERRULES KLXs Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion (Dkt. No. 8) is DENIED
Defendant KLX Energy Services filed a Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 8.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 29), recommending denial of KLX’s Motion. KLX has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 30.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and KLX’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES KLX’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion (Dkt. No. 8) is DENIED.
So Ordered thisJun 29, 2023
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Safoco, Inc. v. KLX Energy Services,Llc, No. 2:22-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2023).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.
