Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Smart Path Connections, LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 2:22-cv-00296 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00296, Dkt. No. 284
Decided
March 28, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 249 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SMART PATH CONNECTIONS, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

Case No. 2:22-CV-00296-JRG-RSP §

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION §

§

Defendant. §

§

ORDER .

Smart Path Connections, LLC previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Certain of Nokia’s Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. No. 113.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 249), recommending granting-in-part of the motion. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, it is ADOPTED and the Motion (Dkt. No. 113) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as indicated in the Report and Recommendation.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2024.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Smart Path Connections, LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 2:22-cv-00296 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00296-14
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00296-14

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case