IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
HOWLINK GLOBAL LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-0040-JRG-RSP
§ (LEAD CASE)
AT&T, INC, ET AL., §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER
Defendants1 filed Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1: Non-infringement Due to Application of the Festo Bar. (Dkt. No. 165.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 216) that Defendants’ Motion be granted. Plaintiff Howlink Global LLC filed Objections (Dkt. No. 224) and Defendants filed a Response (Dkt. No. 225).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on the Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Howlink’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that the Motion (Dkt. No. 165) is GRANTED.
So Ordered this Jun 21, 2023
Footnotes
- ↩ 1 AT&T Corp., AT&T Communications LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, and AT&T Services, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Enterprises Solutions, LLC, Verizon Business Global LLC, Verizon Business Network Services LLC, Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc., Verizon Data Services LLC, Verizon Media Inc., and Verizon Online LLC, Nokia of America Corporation, and Ericsson, Inc.