Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Carvana LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00482 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00482, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
November 7, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 76 Report and Recommendations re 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Carvana LLC
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ESTECH SYSTEMS IP, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

Case No. 2:21-CV-00482-JRG-RSP §

(Lead Case) CARVANA LLC, §

§

Defendant. §

§

ORDER .

Carvana LLC previously moved to dismiss for failure to state claims of direct, pre-suit indirect, and willful infringement. Dkt. No. 16. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 76, recommending the motion be denied. Given that no objections have been filed and based upon the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Carvana LLC’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 16, is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of November, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Carvana LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00482 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00482-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00482-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case