Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Mitel Networks, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 214
Decided
November 7, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 176 Report and Recommendations Court OVERRULES defendant Abbott Laboratories objection, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and orders that the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 47) is DENIED
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ESTECH SYSTEMS IP, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 2:21-CV-00473-JRG-RSP

§ (Lead Case) MITEL NETWORKS, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

§

ORDER

Consolidated defendant Abbott Laboratories previously filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and (6) raising a licen sing defense. (Dkt. No. 47.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 176), recommending that the motion be denied. Defendant Abbott Laboratories has since filed an objection (Dkt. No. 186), and Estech Systems IP, LLC has filed a response (Dkt. No. 196).

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the motion to dismiss, the Report . and Recommendation, and the briefing on the objection and response, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the objection fails to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES defendant Abbott Laboratories’ objection, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and orders that the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 47) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of November, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Mitel Networks, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00473-8
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00473-8

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.