Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Whirlpool Corporation v. Bumperr Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00432 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00432, Dkt. No. 15
Decided
December 23, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Sealed Patent Motion, filed by Whirlpool Corporation
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 2:21-cv-00432-JRG-RSP

§

BUMPERR LTD., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation previously filed a Motion for Default Judgment . and Permanent Injunction. ( Dkt. No. 9.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14), recommending granting Whirlpool’s motion. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, after de novo review, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Whirlpool’s Motion (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED. A final judgment will follow.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of December, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Whirlpool Corporation v. Bumperr Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00432 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00432-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00432-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.