Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Varta Microbattery GmbH v. audio Partnership LLC et al, No. 2:21-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00400, Dkt. No. 60
Decided
January 11, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 56 Report and Recommendations. Court OVERRULES EVEs Objections (Dkt. No. 59), ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56), and ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 24) is DENIED
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VARTA MICROBATTERY GMBH, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 2:21-cv-00400-JRG-RSP

§ (Lead Case)

AUDIO PARTNERSHIP LLC and AUDIO § PARTNERSHIP PLC d/b/a CAMBRIDGE § AUDIO, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Defendant EVE Energy Co., Ltd. (“EVE” ) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. No. 24). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56), recommending denial of EVE’s Motion to Dismiss. EVE has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 59). .

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES EVE’s Objections (Dkt. No. 59), ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56), and ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 24) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of January, 2023.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Varta Microbattery GmbH v. audio Partnership LLC et al, No. 2:21-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2023).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00400-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00400-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case