Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al, No. 2:21-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00213, Dkt. No. 260
Decided
September 19, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER - OVERRULES the Objections
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1, §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00213-JRG § (LEAD CASE)

TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM §

ERICSSON, ERICSSON, INC., §

§ Defendants. §

§

2.

their respective Objections unpersuasive. Accordingly, the court OVERRULES the Objections and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim Construction Order.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of September, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Footnotes

  1. v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00215-JRG § (MEMBER CASE) NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA § SOLUTIONS AND NETWORK OY, § NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, § § Defendants. § § ORDER Before the Court is the Claim Construction Order issued by Magistrate Judge Payne dated June 14, 2022 (Dkt. No. 133) (the “Claim Construction Order”). Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge
  2. 1 (“IP Bridge”) and Defendants Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Network Oy, and Nokia of America Corporation’s (together, “Nokia” and Defendants Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson Inc. (together, “Ericsson”) (Nokia and Ericsson collectively, “Defendants”) have filed Objections to the Order (Dkt. Nos. 142, 144). After considering the reason provided in the Claim Construction Order, the underlying claim construction briefing, and IP Bridge’s and Defendants’ Objections, the Court agrees with the conclusions reached within the Order and finds IP Bridge’s and Defendants’ arguments within

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al, No. 2:21-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00213-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00213-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case