Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Mobile Equity Corp. v. Walmart Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 404
Decided
October 21, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 380 Report and Recommendations for 205 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment thatCertain References Qualify as Statutory Prior Art, filed by WALMART INC.,
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MOBILE EQUITY CORP., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 2:21-cv-00126-JRG-RSP

§

WALMART INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER .

Defendant Walmart Inc. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that Certain References Qualify as Statutory Prior Art (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 205.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 380), recommending denying the Motion. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Walmart’s Motion (Dkt. No. 205) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of October, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mobile Equity Corp. v. Walmart Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00126-14
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00126-14

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case