Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00080 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00080, Dkt. No. 124
Decided
October 25, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 110 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CA, INC. and AVAGO § TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL §

SALES PTE. LIMITED, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

Case No. 2:21-cv-00080-JRG-RSP v. §

§

NETFLIX, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending denial of Defendant Netflix, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Impr oper Venue, or in the Alternative, Transfer to the Northern District of California (the “Report and Recommendation”) (Dkt. No. 110). Netflix, Inc. filed its Objections to the Report and Recommendation on October 5, 2021. (Dkt. No. 114.)

After considering de novo the reasoning provided in the Report and Recommendation, . the underlying briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, and the Objections filed by Netflix, Inc., the Court agrees with the conclusions reached in the Report and Recommendation and finds the arguments made in the Objections to be unpersuasive. Accordingly, the Court overrules the Objections and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

The Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Transfer to the Northern District of California (Dkt. No. 26) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of October, 2021.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00080 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00080-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00080-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.