Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Agis Software Development LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Venue / Transfer Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00072, Dkt. No. 334
Decided
January 19, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 212 Report and Recommendations; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE Case No. 2:21-cv-00024
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT §

LLC, §

§ Case No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Plaintiff, § (LEAD CASE)

v. § § T-MOBILE USA, INC. AND T- §

MOBILE US INC., §

LYFT, INC. § Case No. 2:21-cv-00024-JRG-RSP

§ (MEMBER CASE)

Defendants. §

ORDER

Defendant Lyft, Inc. previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Dkt. No. 30.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 212), recommending granting Lyft’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC has now filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Objections (Dkt. No. 258.)

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss for Improper . Venue, the Report and Recommendation, and AGIS’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES AGIS’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Dkt. No. 30) is GRANTED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE Case No. 2:21-cv-00024. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of January, 2022.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Agis Software Development LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00072-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00072-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error