§ Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant, § § Case No. 2:20-cv-00189-JRG-RSP v. § § ENDURANCE LIFT SOLUTIONS, INC., §
§ Defendant / Counter-Plaintiff. §
§
ORDER
Counter-Defendant Finalrod IP, LLC (“Finalrod”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and to Strike Pursuant to FRCP 12(f) (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 17.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38), recommending denial of Finalrod’s Motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED.
So Ordered this
Mar 1, 2021
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Finalrod IP, LLC v. Endurance Lift Solutions, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00189 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2021).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.
