Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Luminati Networks Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00188 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2021)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00188, Dkt. No. 58
Decided
January 25, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 51 Report and Recommendations re 17 Sealed Motion filed by NetNut Ltd
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

LUMINATI NETWORKS LTD., § §

Plaintiff, §

Case No. 2:20-cv-00188-JRG-RSP § v. § § NETNUT LTD., § §

Defendant. §

ORDER

Defendant NetNut Ltd. previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 17). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 51), recommending denial of NetNut’s Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed, and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED.

So Ordered this Jan 25, 2021

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Luminati Networks Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00188 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2021).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_20-cv-00188-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_20-cv-00188-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case